It would also be nice to reveal which final score each of the submission files received, so that we know which approach won out in the end
+1 to both message in this post.
Hi.
Thanks for participating!
1) The deadline for writing reports is past deadline, so there is no option to write the report anymore, sorry.
The templates for the invited papers should be provided by the IEEE BigData conference.
Prof. Slęzak will contact invited authors.
2) About the final scores per each submission.
We do not have the front-end for such functionality, but I will sugest to include this as an improvement to the platform.
In most cases, the single best solution was not chosen as one of the 3 for evaluation :)
(I meant to post this here, not the other thread. Sorry!)
Is it possible for you to manually inspect the scores and tell us the scores for each of the final 3 submissions? At least for the teams with invited papers?
The three models we chose used very different techniques (by design, since we weren't sure of how the final test set would be distributed), so knowing which was best changes our paper dramatically.
